Containment Early Cold war Essay -- miscellaneous

Containment Early Cold warIn the azoic years of the Cold War, both the Truman and Eisenhower administrations pursued a policy of containment to counter perceived Soviet aggression. Generally, the presidential administrations pursued this policy to maintain stableness in the international arena, to maintain a balance of power, and also in a sense, to express disapproval of totalitarian, non-democratic regimes. Containment was expressed through a alteration of policies and institutions economic, political and, of course, military. The ways the early presidential administrations defined and implemented containment dodging inevitably changed in focus, importance, and emphasis over time. While both remote and internal reasons accounted to an extent for the specifics of the containment policies of both administrations, the Truman administration was more concerned with maintaining a balance of power within the international community than necessarily assuage internal pressures, espec ially fiscal pressures. The Eisenhower administration, on the other(a) hand, assigned a greater importance to domestic politics in formulating its containment policies. First I will outline the differences of the two administrations, and then I will get by that the differences in the two administrations stem from their predominant influences whereas external threats mainly influence the Truman administrations containment policy, internal politics mainly shaped the Eisenhower administrations containment policy. First of all, both administrations had diverse economic priorities. Although Truman was concerned about keeping taxes low and government consumption capped, he also saw the need for military expenditures in europium and Asia to keep an adequate balance of power. Truman implemented an assortment of aid packages to atomic number 63 and Asia, in effect, to help those countries help themselves. He saw economic stability as essential for peace and stability in the intentional arena. Moreover, he saw giving aid to these countries as a way to subtly influence the ideology of their constituents. Furthermore, Truman accepted ongoing government economic interjection as an appropriate way to direct resources within the economy. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more interested in a conservative fiscal policy, and moneyed control on government spending. He was more intent on trading with the countrie... ...endencies, they took their influence for policy from different sources. Thus, their foreign policy had a different approach. The Truman administration was more concerned with Stalins expansionist tendencies, and sought-after(a) to contain him by the best means possible, which he considered to be effected warfare. Truman utilise rhetoric and threat to sell his policy to Congress and the American people, because his policy was expensive. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more concerned with his popularity and cutting taxes than move expensive overseas militaries. He was able to cut costs by using nuclear capabilities as a deterrent against the Soviets. Thus, he used a more capital-intensive, and less labor-intensive means to detract Soviet expansion. Because he was able to cut costs so effectively, it was not as important for him to sell him policy to the public. That is namely why Eisenhower was such a popular president.Referenceswww.globalsecurity.org/military/ library/report/1992/MJA.htmwww.nwc.navy.mil/CNCSCaseStudies/cases/case09.htmwww.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/truman/regentsprep.org/Regents/ushisgov/themes/ presidentialactions/commander.cfm